midcult

mid·cult

 (mĭd′kŭlt′)
n.
A form of intellectual and artistic culture that has qualities of high culture and mass culture without being either.

American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition. Copyright © 2016 by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. All rights reserved.

midcult

(ˈmɪdˌkʌlt)
n
middlebrow culture
Collins English Dictionary – Complete and Unabridged, 12th Edition 2014 © HarperCollins Publishers 1991, 1994, 1998, 2000, 2003, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2011, 2014
References in periodicals archive ?
A decade later, however, this indulgent attitude changed: the same phenomenon was reanimated and harshly criticized in the essay Masscult and Midcult by American critic Dwight Macdonald.
A seminal takedown of "middlebrow" culture may be found in Dwight Macdonald, "Masscult & Midcult," in Macdonald's Against the American Grain (375).
Yes, Dwight Macdonald famously excoriated the enfeeblements of "mass cult and midcult," and Irving Howe regretted "This Age of Conformity," but from today's perspective, when we look back at the offerings of the Book-of-the-Month Club and projects such as the Great Books of the Western World, their scorn looks misplaced.
La cultura alta e il midcult possono aiutarsi a vicenda, sdoganando l'una verso un pubblico di non addetti ai lavori, e rendendo l'altro fruibile anche in chiave scolastica e accademica (si pensi a Il formaggio e i vermi di Carlo Ginzburg, a Baudolino di Umberto Eco).
Worse still, it is "midcult", recalling Dwight Macdonald--i.e., "unexceptional art whose highbrow trappings convince consumers they are putting real cultural work into consuming it." Finally, striking at the very heart of the series as historical fiction, he scornfully notes the "ostentatious intrusion of historical events" which, far from being organically absorbed into the action, are "showy Moments for the readers/viewers." (4)
There's a wonderful essay by Macdonald called "Masscult and Midcult" where he argues that intellectuals should never dumb themselves down for the masses.
He discusses early critiques and aesthetic statements, Macdonald at Partisan Review, Politics and culture, a theory of mass culture, and masscult and midcult. He does not provide an index.
It's midcult disguised as masscult, but Talulla Rising fails to totally satisfy either cultural polarity--too silly to take as completely serious, too competently written to dismiss." DREW TOAL